Key result
LBBB is linked to significantly impaired RV global longitudinal strain compared to healthy controls.
Why the study?
LBBB is a common conduction disorder with typical morphological effects, but RV functional and strain parameters in LBBB patients measured by cMRI compared to healthy controls were not well characterized.
Does left bundle branch block impair right ventricular strain parameters measured by cardiac MRI compared to healthy controls?
Case-Control (n=81)
Single-blind
No
Does left bundle branch block impair right ventricular strain parameters measured by cardiac MRI compared to healthy controls?
Absolute Event Rate: -15.4% vs -18.4%
p-value: p=<0.001
Cardiac MRI strain imaging reveals that patients with LBBB have significantly impaired right ventricular function, primarily driven by septal motion abnormalities, even when standard volumetric parameters appear normal.
LBBB-associated RV strain impairment on cMRI should not change practice; leaves open prognostic value and causal mechanisms.
Left bundle branch block (LBBB) is a common conduction disorder leading to typical morphological phenomena. The aim of the following study is to measure right ventricular (RV) functional and strain parameters in patients with LBBB using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) and compare them with those of a healthy control group. 41 patients (median age 57 years) and 41 healthy controls (median age 38 years, 18 female each), who underwent comprehensive cMRI, were retrospectively included. Right ventricle CINE-sequences were analysed by semi-automated segmentation using CVI42 (Circle Cardiovascular Imaging, Calgary, Canada) for functional, and Segment (Medviso, Lund, Sweden) for strain analysis. All parameters were tested for statistically significant differences using Wilcoxon test followed by Bonferoni-Holm correction. Patients had statistically significant impaired RV global longitudinal strain (LS) (median, − 15.40%[IQR, − 18.40 to − 10.97%] vs. − 18.40% [IQR, − 20.85 to − 16.50%]; p < 0.001), RV global circumferential strain (CS) (median, − 9.40% [IQR, − 12.90 to − 5.00%] vs. − 13.60% [IQR, − 15.35 to − 12.03%]; p < 0.001) and RV mid-ventricular CS (median, − 8.42% [IQR, − 10.83 to − 4.95%] vs. − 11.34% [IQR, − 14.58 to − 8.72%]; p < 0.001) compared to controls. Subdividing the RV into lateral and septal segments showed significant differences in septal LS, septal CS and septal mid-ventricular CS in patients with LBBB compared to controls. All RV strain parameters were impaired in patients with LBBB compared to healthy controls with the septum being the driving differentiator.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kamieniarz et al. (2026) conducted a case-control in Left bundle branch block (LBBB) (n=81). Left bundle branch block vs. Healthy controls was evaluated on Right ventricular global longitudinal strain (RV GLS) (p=<0.001). Left bundle branch block was associated with significantly impaired right ventricular global longitudinal strain (median -15.40% vs -18.40%, p<0.001) compared to healthy controls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: