Key result
LBBB is not linked to impaired LA reservoir or conduit strain in patients with DCM.
Why the study?
The impact of LBBB on LA strain parameters assessed by cMRI had not been studied systematically in patients with ischaemic and non-ischaemic DCM.
Does the presence of left bundle branch block (LBBB) impair left atrial strain parameters assessed by cMRI in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy?
Observational (n=81)
No
Does the presence of left bundle branch block (LBBB) impair left atrial strain parameters assessed by cMRI in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy?
Absolute Event Rate: 11.43% vs 10.71%
p-value: p=0.862
The presence of LBBB does not significantly impair left atrial strain parameters in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, supporting the robustness of these cMRI-derived functional parameters despite conduction abnormalities.
LA strain assessment in DCM with LBBB warrants caution on cMRI; leaves open adjustment for conduction effects in prognostic models.
Left atrial (LA) strain parameters predict mortality in patients with ischaemic/non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Left bundle branch block (LBBB) is a common conduction abnormality in those patients. To date, the impact of LBBB on LA strain parameters assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) has not been studied systematically. In this retrospective single-centre study, we included 20 (10 female) controls without DCM or LBBB, 21 (11 female) patients with LBBB without DCM, 20 (7 female) patients with DCM without LBBB, and 20 (9 female) patients with DCM and LBBB. LA volumes and strain were assessed semi-automatically using the cvi42® and Segment® software. LA reservoir/conduit strain and corresponding strain rates were significantly impaired in patients with DCM (p = 0.003/0.022 respectively < 0.001/0.004) in comparison to controls. The presence of LBBB did not lead to significant changes of LA reservoir/conduit strain in controls (p = 0.919/0.391) nor in patients with DCM (p = 0.862/0.999), same was true for LA reservoir/conduit strain rate in patients with DCM (p = 0.999/0.812). LA conduit strain rate of patients with LBBB was significantly impaired in comparison to controls (p = 0.005). Left ventricular dilatation was associated with significantly impaired LA reservoir/conduit strain/strain rates. The presence of LBBB was not associated with additional impairment in LA strain/strain rate parameters in patients with ischaemic/non-ischaemic DCM, supporting the robustness of LA functional parameters in the presence of this common conduction abnormality. However, in patients with LBBB without dilatation LA conduit strain rate was significantly impaired in comparison to controls and further studies are needed to evaluate the impact of this finding.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Petersen et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Dilated cardiomyopathy and left bundle branch block (n=81). Left bundle branch block vs. Absence of left bundle branch block was evaluated on Left atrial reservoir strain in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (p=0.862). The presence of left bundle branch block did not significantly impair left atrial reservoir or conduit strain in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy compared to those without the conduction abnormality.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: