Key result
Higher baseline CRP linked to ~16-fold higher odds of 6-month HFrEF readmission.
Why the study?
Inflammatory activation and left atrial remodelling may capture complementary dimensions of residual risk in HFrEF, but their prognostic value for early readmission risk stratification is unclear.
Does the addition of inflammatory biomarkers (CRP) and left atrial volume index (LAVI) to a clinical model improve the prediction of 6-month heart failure readmission in patients with HFrEF?
Cohort (n=150)
No
Does the addition of inflammatory biomarkers (CRP) and left atrial volume index (LAVI) to a clinical model improve the prediction of 6-month heart failure readmission in patients with HFrEF?
Odds Ratio: 16.16 (95% CI 4.62–56.51)
The addition of CRP and left atrial volume index to conventional clinical models significantly improves early risk stratification for 6-month readmission in patients with HFrEF.
May aid 6-month HFrEF readmission risk stratification when added to clinical models; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
Background and Objectives: Inflammatory activation and left atrial remodelling may capture complementary dimensions of residual risk in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). This study evaluated the prognostic value of routinely available inflammatory biomarkers and the left atrial volume index (LAVI) for early identification of patients at risk of heart-failure-related readmission. Materials and Methods: In this single-centre observational cohort study, 150 clinically stable patients with HFrEF were enrolled, including 75 with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and 75 with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Baseline C-reactive protein (CRP), fibrinogen, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and LAVI were assessed. The primary outcome was documented readmission for heart-failure decompensation within 6 months. Group comparisons, Spearman correlations, logistic regression, receiver-operating-characteristic analysis, and bootstrap internal validation were performed. Results: All participants completed 6-month follow-up, no deaths occurred, and 45 patients (30.0%) were readmitted. Compared with non-readmitted patients, those readmitted had higher NT-proBNP (3058 (2019–4567) vs. 648 (229–1267) pg/mL), fibrinogen (407.8 ± 59.0 vs. 331.3 ± 52.3 mg/dL), CRP (5.60 (3.86–7.82) vs. 2.12 (1.00–2.84) mg/L), and LAVI (33.90 (32.70–34.50) vs. 30.90 (30.20–31.90) mL/m2; all q < 0.001). In the primary model, each CRP doubling (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 16.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.62–56.51) and each 1 mL/m2 increase in LAVI (OR 2.50, 95% CI 1.23–5.10) independently predicted readmission. The augmented model achieved an apparent AUC of 0.962 and a bootstrap-corrected AUC of 0.944, compared to 0.856 and 0.828, respectively, for the clinical model. Conclusions: Adding CRP and LAVI to a conventional clinical model provided substantial incremental prognostic information for 6-month readmission in HFrEF. The findings support the integration of inflammatory and left-atrial remodelling measures with, rather than in place of, established clinical risk factors, although external validation is required before clinical implementation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vladutu et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n=150). C-reactive protein (CRP) and left atrial volume index (LAVI) vs. Lower levels of CRP and LAVI was evaluated on Documented readmission for heart-failure decompensation within 6 months (OR 16.16, 95% CI 4.62-56.51). Higher baseline CRP (OR 16.16 per doubling) and LAVI (OR 2.50 per 1 mL/m2 increase) independently predicted 6-month readmission for heart-failure decompensation in patients with HFrEF.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: