Key result
Rising 6-month BNP linked to ~3.4-fold higher risk of death or heart failure hospitalization.
Why the study?
The association between changes in BNP levels from discharge to 6-month visit and subsequent clinical outcomes in patients with acute heart failure was investigated.
Does percent change in BNP from discharge to 6-month visit predict the composite of all-cause death or hospitalization for HF in patients with acute heart failure?
Cohort (n=446)
Yes
Does percent change in BNP from discharge to 6-month visit predict the composite of all-cause death or hospitalization for HF in patients with acute heart failure?
Hazard Ratio: 3.43 (95% CI 1.51–8.46)
Absolute Event Rate: 26.8% vs 6.9%
p-value: p=0.003
Percent change in BNP from discharge to 6 months is a strong predictor of subsequent death or heart failure hospitalization, independent of absolute BNP levels.
Rising BNP post-discharge may flag higher HF event risk; hypothesis-generating and needs prospective validation before clinical use.
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the association between changes in brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) from discharge to 6-month visit and subsequent clinical outcomes in patients with acute heart failure (AHF). METHODS: Among 1246 patients enrolled in the prospective longitudinal follow-up study nested from the Kyoto Congestive Heart Failure registry, this study population included 446 patients with available paired BNP data at discharge and 6-month index visit. This study population was classified into 3 groups by percent change in BNP from discharge to 6-month visit; the low tertile (≤-44%, N = 149), the middle tertile (>-44% and ≤22%, N = 149) and the high tertile (>22%, N = 148). FINDINGS: The cumulative 180-day incidence after the index visit of the primary outcome measure (a composite endpoint of all-cause death or hospitalization for HF) was significantly higher in the high and middle tertiles than in the low tertile (26.8% and 14.4% versus 6.9%, log-rank P<0.0001). The adjusted excess risk of the high tertile relative to the low tertile remained significant for the primary outcome measure (hazard ratio: 3.43, 95% confidence interval: 1.51-8.46, P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Percent change in BNP was associated with a subsequent risk for a composite of all-cause death and hospitalization for HF after adjustment of the absolute BNP values, suggesting that observing the change in BNP levels, in addition to absolute BNP levels themselves, helps us to manage patient with HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shiba et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Acute heart failure (n=446). High tertile of percent change in BNP (>22% increase from discharge to 6-month visit) vs. Low tertile of percent change in BNP (≤-44% decrease) was evaluated on Composite of all-cause death or hospitalization for heart failure (HR 3.43, 95% CI 1.51-8.46, p=0.003). A high tertile of percent change in BNP from discharge to 6-month visit (>22% increase) was associated with a significantly higher risk of all-cause death or heart failure hospitalization compared to the low tertile (HR 3.43).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: