Cardiovascular disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in childhood cancer survivors. We assessed the very long-term cardiac structure and function of adult survivors of childhood leukemia treated with anthracycline-based therapy. One hundred fifteen patients with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treated on Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Childhood ALL Consortium Protocols between 1972 and 1989 were evaluated for this study. Patient medical records were reviewed to evaluate echocardiograms and cardiac status. Median cardiac follow-up was 17.3 years (range 2.8–39.2). Mean left ventricular fractional shortening (LVFS) was reduced by last follow-up (> 24 years: -2.42 SD [ P <0.05]). Left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic dimension, initially dilated, subsequently normalized, and then was markedly decreased at last follow-up (change over time: P < 0.001). LV thickness-dimension ratio significantly reduced until 21 years of follow-up, subsequently increased secondary to a reduction in LV dimension and increasing LV wall-thickness. This rise in LV wall-thickness was accompanied by a progressive, significant reduction in LV mass. Reduced LV end-diastolic dimension, LVFS and LV wall-thickness were associated with cumulative anthracycline dose ( P <0.05). Anthracycline-associated cardiotoxicity transitions over time from a subclinical dilated cardiomyopathy to a restrictive-like cardiomyopathy detectable at ≥ 15 years after exposure. The restrictive-like phase is characterized by a progressive fall in LV dimension over time further below the normal range for body size and is more than change in LV wall-thickness, resulting in normalization of the LV thickness-to-dimension ratio. Patients are left with a heart that is functionally inadequate for their body size, or Grinch Syndrome. Monitoring for late clinically significant cardiotoxicity is essential.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lipshultz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: