This article examines the migration trajectories of Bosnian migrants to Slovenia with a primary focus on circular migration. While circular migration has been promoted within European policy frameworks as a model benefiting origin countries, destination countries, and migrants, its empirical outcomes remain contested. Drawing on a mixed-methods approach, the study combines an analysis of residence permit data with qualitative insights from semi-structured interviews with Bosnian migrants in Slovenia. The findings reveal that, although temporary labour migration has increased, circular migration rarely materializes as a sustained pattern. Instead, migration trajectories tend to evolve towards long-term or permanent settlement, driven by labour market conditions, family reunification, and migrants’ social integration in the host country. The article argues that circular migration should not be understood as a distinct or stable form of mobility, but rather as a conditional and context-dependent model shaped by the interaction of structural factors, institutional frameworks, and migrant agency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ana Ješe Perković (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: