Fly ash, an abundant industrial by-product, was evaluated as a mineral filler modifier for 60/70 penetration-grade bitumen at 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20% by binder weight, combining particle and chemical characterization with conventional, rheological, and fatigue testing. The fly ash sourced from Kogi State, Nigeria, exhibited Class F-type chemical characteristics, although its SO₃ content exceeded the ASTM C618 limit for cementitious applications. Fly ash addition consistently stiffened the binder across all dosages. The central finding was a dosage-by-aging interaction: in the unaged condition, 15% fly ash passed the G*/sinδ rutting criterion one temperature increment higher than every other dosage, while 20% fly ash underperformed relative to 15% FA, consistent with the higher filler fraction disrupting binder continuity before oxidative hardening. After RTFOT aging this ranking reversed, with 20% fly ash remaining compliant across the entire 52–82°C range, attributed to its larger filler surface area providing more sites for interaction with oxidative aging products. Fatigue resistance showed a generally declining but non-monotonic trend with dosage when unaged, with a partial recovery at 15% FA, and improved substantially after aging at the higher dosages. These results demonstrate that fly ash is an effective bitumen modifier for hot-climate pavements, but optimum dosage is condition-dependent and should reflect the expected aging state and governing distress mechanism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shuaibu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: