Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study develops an integrated multi-algorithm spatial simulation framework for large-scale urban expansion analysis by combining a Back Propagation Artificial Neural Network (BP-ANN), the Future Land Use Simulation (FLUS) model, Cellular Automata (CA), the standard deviational ellipse, Neighborhood Aggregation Analysis, and landscape metrics within a unified data flow. Using the 2020 land use pattern as the baseline, BP-ANN estimates land use suitability probabilities from multiple driving factors; FLUS-CA allocates land under SSP1–SSP5 through adaptive inertia, neighborhood effects, and conversion costs; and spatial statistics and landscape metrics diagnose expansion magnitude, local aggregation, direction, built-up morphology, and cross-country differences. Urban built-up areas expand continuously under all scenarios, increasing by 38.92–49.33% by 2050 relative to 2020. Areas of high local aggregation intensity exhibit pronounced spatial differentiation, while the regional pattern maintains a northwest–southeast orientation, with scenario-dependent differences in centroid location and spatial dispersion. Edge density generally declines as built-up land increases, indicating greater built-up contiguity at the regional scale; this pattern should not be interpreted as evidence of reduced ecological landscape fragmentation. New built-up land encroaches on farmland and coastal ecological spaces and displays marked cross-country heterogeneity. The framework connects driving-factor identification, scenario configuration, spatial allocation, and pattern diagnosis, providing methodological support for cross-national multi-scenario simulation, urban planning, ecological conservation, and transboundary spatial collaborative governance in ASEAN.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xie et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: