Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Abstract γδ T-cell-based immunotherapies have become relevant as alternatives to conventional αβ T-cell products, with preclinical data demonstrating tumor burden reduction and the mitigation of tumor-induced tissue damage. Given that most CAR constructs have been optimized for αβ T cells, we hypothesized that distinct T-cell types may require tailored CAR architectures to achieve optimal function. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a systematic comparative analysis of γδ and αβ T cells transduced with a second-generation PSCA-targeting CAR (PSCA-8t28z). We found that although γδ and αβ CAR-T cells exhibit comparable levels of cytotoxicity, they differ phenotypically. Through a system-level phosphoproteomic analysis, we identified 307 phosphosites whose abundance differed between γδ and αβ CAR-T cells. Pathway enrichment analysis placed glycolysis/gluconeogenesis and TCR signaling within the top significantly overrepresented signaling networks. The results of functional validation studies confirmed that γδ CAR-T cells have lower glycolytic and oxidative phosphorylation capacity than αβ-CAR-T cells do and weaker activation of activator protein 1 (AP-1). Notably, we identified thioredoxin-interacting protein (TXNIP) as a potential actionable target to enhance γδ CAR-T-cell metabolism. Finally, we designed a new synthetic costimulatory receptor that potentiates AP-1 activation, resulting in improved in vivo persistence. These results highlight the fundamental biological differences between γδ and αβ T cells and support the development of cell type-specific receptor engineering strategies to maximize γδ CAR-T-cell function and therapeutic benefit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bustos et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: