Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction Project organization is an under‐studied but important aspect of volunteer engagement in ecological restoration and conservation. Previous studies on volunteer commitment have found that people are more engaged in well‐organized projects, but what constitutes good project organization from a volunteer perspective has not been empirically examined. Objectives This study investigates how the components of project organization (i.e. social capital, transformational leadership, and organizational capacity) relate to volunteer engagement in ecological restoration and conservation projects. Methods We conducted an online survey of volunteers in ecological restoration and conservation projects in Ontario, Canada (182 respondents accessed the survey; 143 provided analyzable responses) to examine the relationship between these three factors and volunteer engagement. Results A path analysis showed that transformational leadership ( β = 0.472, p < 0.001) and organizational capacity ( β = 0.263, p = 0.002) were positively associated with social capital, which in turn was positively associated with volunteer engagement ( β = 0.407, p < 0.001). The model accounted for 37.7% of the variance in social capital and 16.6% in volunteer engagement. Neither transformational leadership nor organizational capacity showed a direct association with volunteer engagement once social capital was accounted for. Conclusion Volunteer engagement was most strongly associated with social capital—the trust, shared vision, and interpersonal connections among volunteers—and the associations of leadership and organizational capacity with engagement appear to operate through it rather than independently. Because the design is cross‐sectional and single‐source, these are associations rather than causal effects. Practitioners seeking to increase engagement nonetheless have grounds to attend to the relational dimension of their programs alongside leadership and resourcing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alamenciak et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: