This integrative conceptual review develops a testable framework for explaining creative engagement in sustainable blended fine art learning in Chinese higher education. It is a non-systematic review designed for theory building rather than exhaustive evidence aggregation. A transparent search and synthesis process brought together 52 sources published primarily between 2000 and September 2026, supplemented by seminal earlier works and Chinese policy documents. Six strands were integrated: technology adoption, blended inquiry, student and creative engagement, digital inequality, flow and achievement emotion, and AI-mediated authorship. The framework distinguishes socioeconomic status from meaningful accessibility and treats purposeful digital tool usage as a behavioural antecedent rather than an engagement outcome. It proposes two context-sensitive psychological mechanisms: techno-aesthetic flow, an absorbed alignment between tool action and artistic intention; and attribution anxiety, concern about authorship, originality, ownership, and evaluation in AI-assisted work. Eight propositions connect structural opportunity, tool use, these mechanisms, and cognitive, emotional, and behavioural creative engagement. Chinese national digitalisation, regulated generative-AI services, regional and institutional capacity, and assessment rules are specified as contextual boundary conditions. The framework contributes by moving beyond adoption-centred models toward an equity-aware, studio-sensitive account of participation. It also defines construct boundaries, suggests measurement routes, and identifies educational, institutional, and environmental implications for sustainable implementation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jing Han (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: