Different cutoff values should be used in early pregnancy to determine whether nuchal translucency (NT) is abnormal. This study aimed to identify the optimal index for increased NT and explore a new method for standardizing NT and CRL as a supplemental marker for predicting birth defects. In phase 1, 575,674 pregnant women who underwent free measurement of NT were enrolled, and cutoff values for indices, such as CRL/NT, CRL/NT 2 , and NT/CRL 2 , were calculated. In Phase 2, 3,825 pregnant women, including group A, B and C, were recruited to compare the screening performance of traditional standards of increased NT and the new methods. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that CRL/NT demonstrated comparable performance for all chromosomal abnormalities (AUC = 0.809, 95%CI :0.787–0.832), compared with CRL/NT 2 (AUC = 0.809, 95%CI : 0.786–0.831), NT/CRL 2 (AUC = 0.803, 95%CI :0.780–0.826), NT (AUC = 0.806, 95%CI :0.783–0.829). CRL/NT ≤ P 5 detected an additional 20.9% of chromosomal or structural abnormalities compared to NT ≥ P 95 . In conclusion, CRL/NT ≤ P 5 demonstrated screening performance comparable to NT≥ P 95 , while potentially identifying a small number of additional abnormal fetuses with a modest reduction in specificity. Therefore, it may warrant further evaluation as a supplemental screening indicator.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: