The Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA) has experienced intensive anthropogenic disturbance driven by rapid economic growth and accelerated urban expansion, resulting in increasing spatial heterogeneity of ecological processes and differentiated ecological risks. In this study, the Remote Sensing Ecological Index (RSEI) was used to assess the spatiotemporal evolution of ecological environmental quality in the GBA from 2015 to 2024. The Hurst exponent was applied to characterize the temporal persistence of ecological change, while Moran’s I was employed to identify spatial clustering patterns and spatial heterogeneity. In addition, Permutation Importance (PI) and Partial Dependence Plots (PDP) were integrated with the Random Forest model to quantify dominant driving factors and their nonlinear effects. The results showed that the overall ecological quality of the GBA remained generally stable during the study period, with only slight interannual fluctuations in RSEI (Slope = − 0.00104, R² = 0.0288). Spatially, high RSEI values were mainly distributed in peripheral mountainous areas, whereas low-value clusters were concentrated in core urban agglomerations, including Guangzhou, Foshan, Dongguan, and Shenzhen. The global Moran’s I values ranged from 0.6562 to 0.7063, indicating significant and stable positive spatial autocorrelation. Hurst exponent analysis revealed that most regions exhibited persistent evolutionary characteristics, while core urban areas showed relatively stronger anti-persistent behaviour and greater uncertainty in future ecological trends. Mechanism analysis demonstrated that elevation (PI = 0.3283) and land surface temperature (PI = 0.2898) were the dominant driving factors, followed by population density (PI = 0.2569) and night-time light intensity (PI = 0.2114). These factors exhibited significant nonlinear and threshold effects on ecological quality. This study provides new insights into the temporal persistence, spatial heterogeneity, and nonlinear driving mechanisms of ecological environmental quality in highly urbanized regions, offering scientific support for ecological governance and sustainable regional development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ge et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: