The original Canonical Dual-STATIS biplot incorporates an a priori group structure into the analysis of a sequence of data tables, but its formulation requires the same individuals to be observed on every occasion, which excludes repeated cross-sectional designs. This paper lifts that restriction and extends the method to tables with non-matched individuals. The group structure is then carried entirely by the variable space: for each table, the between-group and within-group covariance matrices are normalised by their Hilbert–Schmidt norms and combined into two separate compromises, each weighted by the leading eigenvector of its own inter-structure. Canonical directions follow from a symmetric formulation of the generalised eigenvalue problem defined by both compromises, and are displayed in a row-metric-preserving canonical GH biplot whose inter-centroid distances are Mahalanobis distances induced by the within-group compromise. Groups present on only some occasions enter as supplementary elements, and occasion-specific centroids are projected as trajectories. The method is illustrated with four Spanish pre-election surveys comparing the proximity and directional models of electoral evaluation. The joint reading of the global and canonical solutions reveals a Simpson’s paradox: directionality is positively associated with voting probability within every party, but the association reverses between parties, whereas proximity is the stronger discriminator between parties.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boscán et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: