Key result
Integrated multimodality imaging optimizes procedural selection and surgical decision-making in tricuspid regurgitation.
Why the study?
Integrated multimodality imaging is central to diagnosis, referral, procedural selection, and treatment assessment in tricuspid regurgitation, but its role in surgical decision-making requires clarification.
Integrated multimodality imaging is essential for guiding surgical and transcatheter interventions in tricuspid regurgitation before irreversible right-heart and end-organ damage occurs.
Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a clinical syndrome in which integrated multimodality imaging is central to diagnosis, timely referral, procedural selection, and assessment of treatment success. This narrative state-of-the-art review focuses on the imaging information that changes decisions along the surgical pathway while positioning surgery within contemporary transcatheter practice. Transthoracic echocardiography remains the gateway examination; three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography refines leaflet and annular anatomy; cardiac magnetic resonance provides the most reproducible assessment of right ventricular volumes and function; and cardiac computed tomography defines annular geometry, adjacent structures, device leads, and access. We distinguish guideline-endorsed thresholds from observational or consensus-derived decision aids and link mechanism, annular dilatation, leaflet tethering, right ventricular reserve, pulmonary haemodynamics, and end-organ risk to the choice of repair, replacement, transcatheter therapy, or surveillance. Particular emphasis is placed on perioperative imaging: the effects of anaesthesia and loading conditions, accurate septolateral annular measurement, the definition of an acceptable post-bypass result, and the significance of central versus eccentric residual jets. A dedicated section compares imaging requirements for transcatheter edge-to-edge repair and transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement and summarizes post-procedural surveillance. The central message is that imaging does not replace clinical judgement; it provides the shared language through which the Heart Team selects the right intervention before irreversible right-heart and end-organ damage develops.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ghazy et al. (2026) conducted a review in Tricuspid regurgitation. Multimodality imaging was evaluated. Integrated multimodality imaging guides surgical and transcatheter decision-making for tricuspid regurgitation by defining anatomy, right ventricular function, and perioperative results.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: