Key result
Non-occupational physical activity is linked to ~38% lower all-cause mortality in CHD patients.
Why the study?
The dose-response relationship between non-occupational physical activity and all-cause mortality in patients with coronary heart disease remains uncertain.
Does higher non-occupational physical activity reduce all-cause mortality in patients with coronary heart disease?
Meta-Analysis (n=176,862)
Does higher non-occupational physical activity reduce all-cause mortality in patients with coronary heart disease?
Higher non-occupational physical activity is associated with a non-linear reduction in all-cause mortality among CHD patients, with maximal benefits observed at low-to-moderate levels consistent with current ESC guidelines.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support activity counseling in CHD; extends observational dose-response data while leaving higher-intensity thresholds open.
AIM: Higher physical activity (PA) has been associated with lower all-cause mortality in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), but the dose-response relationship remains uncertain. We conducted a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis to quantify the association between non-occupational PA and all-cause mortality in CHD patients. METHODS: We systematically searched six databases in November 2025 for prospective cohort studies reporting non-occupational PA and all-cause mortality in CHD patients. PA data were harmonised to marginal metabolic equivalent of task hours/week (mMET-h/week). We performed two-stage random-effects dose-response meta-analysis using restricted cubic splines. Risk of bias was assessed using the JBI checklist. RESULTS: Seventeen studies included 176,862 patients; 16 reported 31,783 study-level deaths. The primary dose-response curve was modelled over 0-40 mMET-h/week, and showed a non-linear inverse association (P for non-linearity <0.001; I2 = 84.7%). Relative to 0 mMET-h/week, estimated mortality risk was 38% lower at 8.75 mMET-h/week (RR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.54-0.73) and 39% lower at 17.5 mMET-h/week (RR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.47-0.79). At 30 mMET-h/week, the estimate was imprecise (RR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.51-1.67), only 8 of 17 studies had data extending to this knot, and alternative harmonisation assumptions produced a different high-dose shape. CONCLUSION: Higher non-occupational PA was associated with lower all-cause mortality in CHD, particularly at low-to-moderate levels. These activity levels were consistent with the range recommended in current ESC guidelines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tao et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in Coronary heart disease (n=176,862). Non-occupational physical activity vs. 0 mMET-h/week was evaluated on All-cause mortality (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.54-0.73, p=<0.001). Non-occupational physical activity was associated with lower all-cause mortality in CHD patients, with a 38% lower risk at 8.75 mMET-h/week (RR 0.62; 95% CI 0.54-0.73).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: