This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
This work develops an effective non-Abelian gauge-field framework for studyingthe interaction between Yang–Mills fields and fluctuations of the superconducting orderparameter. Conventional superconductivity is commonly described by a complex scalarorder parameter coupled to an Abelian electromagnetic gauge field. This description is highly successful for single-component superconductors, but it may become incomplete in multiband, multicomponent, spin–orbit-coupled, unconventional, and topologically nontrivial superconducting systems. The central hypothesis of this study is that internal superconducting degrees of freedom can be represented by a multiplet order parameter transforming under an effective compact Lie group G. The associated collective gauge connection is represented by a Yang–Mills field Aaµ, while the electromagnetic field is retained as a U(1) gauge field.The resulting theory is a coupled Yang–Mills–Higgs–Ginzburg–Landau model.The effective action contains the non-Abelian field strength, covariant gradients,scalar self-interactions, amplitude and phase fluctuations, dissipative terms, noise contributions, and possible topological couplings. The theory predicts that effective gaugefield fluctuations can renormalize the superconducting transition, modify the coherence length and penetration depth, generate collective vector modes, change vortex-core structures, and produce new couplings between amplitude, phase, orbital, spin, and electromagnetic modes.A real-time formulation based on the Schwinger–Keldysh formalism is proposed todescribe nonequilibrium fluctuations, dissipation, and thermal noise. The frameworkprovides a general effective theory for complex superconducting materials and establishes a connection between superconductivity, emergent gauge fields, topology, and materials engineering.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khaled Aldhufri (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: