Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study investigates the hydrodynamic optimization of a custom-designed dual-hydrofoil craft operating at 8–10 m/s. Hydrofoil span, longitudinal spacing, and front hydrofoil sweep angle are selected as design variables, and their effects on rise-up, trim, and total resistance coefficient are first examined using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Free-surface wave patterns and hydrofoil pressure distributions are further analyzed to clarify the hydrodynamic mechanisms associated with different geometric configurations. To reduce the cost of direct CFD-based optimization, a surrogate-assisted multi-objective framework is developed by coupling a backpropagation neural network (BPNN) with a Multi-Objective Red-Billed Blue Magpie Optimizer (MORBMO). The BPNN is trained using 112 CFD samples and achieves R 2 values of 0.9616, 0.9835, and 0.9490 for rise-up, trim, and total resistance coefficient, respectively. MORBMO is then used to identify a compromise solution that simultaneously accounts for resistance and running attitude. The selected optimized configuration has a front hydrofoil sweep angle of 12°, a hydrofoil span of 2001.49 mm, and a longitudinal spacing of 3292.89 mm. Compared with the baseline design, the optimized craft reduces rise-up by 2.63%, trim by 8.16%, and total resistance coefficient by 0.90%. The stern diverging wave crest height is also reduced by 10.09%. These results indicate that the optimized hydrofoil arrangement mainly improves the running attitude and wave pattern while producing a modest reduction in resistance, providing a practical configuration for balanced hydrodynamic performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: