Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Commercial swim wearables increasingly provide performance feedback but remain restricted by fixed, single-placement designs. When worn outside their intended location, the accuracy of motion recognition and swimming analysis drops sharply. Moreover, most existing devices are closed-source, limiting access to raw sensor data and hindering reproducibility and innovation in aquatic HCI research. To address these limitations, we present AquaTag, an open-source aquatic wearable platform that enables flexible placement and consistent motion analysis across different locations. The AquaTag integrates a motion sensor, barometer, and temperature sensor. Using a documented epoxy-potting workflow adapted from established underwater electronics practices, it remains functional during a controlled pressure test equivalent to approximately 14 m water depth for 30 minutes. To support underwater use, AquaTag offers NOR flash or microSD storage for offline logging and Bluetooth for above-water data synchronization. Its power system provides up to 4.4 hours of offline logging or 7.8 hours of non-submerged streaming. The power control and charging mechanisms are designed to meet the waterproofing requirements of the device. The hardware can be manufactured at about $40 per unit. A companion software suite is also developed to annotate and analyze motion data. Specifically, our contributions include: (1) a compact, robust sensing module with a documented, low-cost waterproof packaging workflow suitable for rapid in-house fabrication; and (2) a placement-adaptive machine learning pipeline that delivers accurate swimming analytics from a single motion sensor at flexible body locations. By conditioning a deep learning backbone on the sensor's mounting position, our model learns to infer swimmer kinematics when worn on the head, wrist, or lower back. In leave-one-subject-out evaluation, AquaTag achieved mean macro- F 1 scores of 91.7% for stroke-type classification and 90.6% for swim-state classification across the head, lower-back, and wrist placements; the corresponding best-placement scores were 96.5% and 92.2%, respectively. The AquaTag hardware designs, PCB files, bill of materials, firmware, enclosure CAD files, fabrication instructions, and companion application are released publicly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: