Large-diameter, long-distance, steeply inclined water-conveyance shafts impose coupled challenges in continuous layout, confined-space launching, anti-backsliding control, gravity-based mucking, and terminal recovery. This paper presents a full-lifecycle TBM construction case from the Luoning pumped-storage hydropower project, where a 7.23 m diameter TBM excavated two upward-driven shafts with inclinations of 36.24° and 38.74°. To maintain construction continuity, the conventional two-stage layout was replaced by a single-stage continuous scheme. A curved foundation and stepping launch system with four synchronous hydraulic cylinders enabled staged assembly and controlled alignment adjustment in limited underground space. During excavation and stepping, two X-shaped gripper assemblies and two independent anti-backsliding systems (ABSs) formed a redundant restraint system with sequential load transfer. Gravity-driven muck transport was coupled with six-state image recognition, probability-level multi-model fusion, and 2 s closed-loop water regulation. Terminal recovery adopted staged dismantling, with independent restraint established before ABS were released, followed by TBM transfer and reuse. Based on project-specific reference quantities, eliminating two intermediate caverns was estimated to avoid approximately 24,000 m 3 of additional cavern excavation and approximately 12 months of associated cavern construction. No overall backward sliding was observed during recorded operation. The fusion model achieved a weighted F1 score of 0.92, while cumulative flushing-water consumption decreased from 6.25 to 5.37 m 3 during a 700 s field comparison. After transfer and reconditioning, the same TBM excavated 859.68 m of the No. 2 shaft over 132 calendar days, corresponding to 6.51 m/d. The case provides project-specific field evidence for coordinating the principal stages of steep upward TBM shaft construction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: