Key result
Biological and digital twins enhance cardiometabolic drug development and CV safety prediction over animal models.
Why the study?
Preclinical cardiometabolic drug development relies on animal models that poorly predict human cardiovascular safety, necessitating alternative human-based systems.
Biological and digital twins represent a paradigm shift in cardiometabolic drug development, offering human-relevant platforms to predict efficacy and cardiovascular safety more accurately than traditional animal models.
Human-based models may better predict cardiotoxicity than animals; leaves open regulatory impact on post-market safety.
Preclinical drug development has long relied on animal models to predict safety and efficacy before agents enter human trials, despite critical differences between human and animal model physiology. The withdrawal of rosiglitazone, rofecoxib, and terfenadine due to cardiovascular toxicity exemplifies the translational cost of this mismatch. Alternative, human-based systems enable more accurate modeling of cardiometabolic diseases in a dish; in 2025, the US FDA’s new approach methodologies (NAMs) roadmap authorized the submission of results from human-relevant models. The roadmap encourages utilizing biological and digital twins as part of an integrated, context-specific, fit-for-purpose strategy. A “biological twin” is a human-derived in vitro system that captures the physiology of a patient and can be used to assess potential cardiotoxicity by drug metabolites. A “digital twin” is the computational counterpart trained on clinical drug response results that can further interpret biological twin data at the patient scale and predict pharmacological parameters. NAMs are no longer experimental but are not yet fully validated as replacements for animal models; major challenges remain before they can be effectively incorporated into the cardiometabolic disease drug discovery pipeline. Addressing these challenges head-on is essential for improving drug development and prediction of their cardiovascular safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patra et al. (2026) conducted a review in Cardiometabolic disease. Biological and digital twins (New Approach Methodologies) vs. Animal models was evaluated. Biological and digital twins offer a human-relevant framework to improve cardiometabolic drug development and predict cardiovascular safety, potentially replacing traditional animal models.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: