Key result
Low Prognostic Nutritional Index linked to ~159% higher MACE risk after invasive coronary angiography.
Why the study?
Malnutrition risk assessed by prognostic nutritional index (PNI) was rarely evaluated before invasive coronary angiography (ICA), and its association with long-term major cardiovascular events was unknown.
Does low prognostic nutritional index (PNI) predict major cardiovascular events in patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography?
Observational (n=485)
No
Does low prognostic nutritional index (PNI) predict major cardiovascular events in patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography?
Hazard Ratio: 2.593 (95% CI 1.418–4.742)
Absolute Event Rate: 17.07% vs 7.18%
p-value: p=0.002
Lower prognostic nutritional index (PNI) independently predicts a higher risk of major cardiovascular events in patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography, highlighting the value of pre-procedural nutritional assessment.
We aimed to examine whether prognostic nutritional index (PNI) could serve as an auxiliary predictor for major cardiovascular events (MCEs) in patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography (ICA). A total of 485 participants were enrolled, divided into low-PNI (≥47.40) and high-PNI (<47.40) groups. ICA determined the stenotic vessels of coronary artery disease. The primary outcome was incidental MCEs, a composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or rehospitalization of in-stent restenosis. There were 47 (9.69%) MCEs during the 3.78-years follow-up. The cumulative incidence of MCEs was significantly higher in the low-PNI patients compared with the high-PNI patients (17.07% vs. 7.18%, p = 0.001). Malnutrition risk (low PNI) was significantly and independently associated with a higher risk of MCEs (hazard ratios: 2.593, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.418−4.742). Combined use of the number of stenotic vessels with malnutrition risk showed a higher capacity to predict the MCEs than the presence of stenotic vessels alone (areas under the receiver operator characteristic curve: 0.696 [95% CI, 0.618−0.775] vs. 0.550 [95% CI, 0.466−0.633], p = 0.013). In conclusion, lower PNI levels may predict a higher risk of cardiovascular events in patients undergoing ICA, which supports the necessity of the risk assessment of nutrition status and guide the clinical treatment on strengthening nutritional support before ICA is performed, as well as nutritional intervention after ICA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Suspected Coronary Artery Disease (n=485). Low Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI < 47.40) vs. High Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI ≥ 47.40) was evaluated on Incidental major cardiovascular events (MCEs), a composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or rehospitalization of in-stent restenosis (HR 2.593, 95% CI 1.418-4.742, p=0.002). Malnutrition risk, indicated by a low Prognostic Nutritional Index, was independently associated with a significantly higher risk of major cardiovascular events (HR 2.593) compared to high PNI in patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: