In proton exchange membrane water electrolyzer (PEMWE) anode catalyst layers (ACLs), optimization has traditionally focused on electrochemical performance while overlooking how ionomer-specific chemistry and loading jointly constrain decal transfer (DT) processability, leaving fabrication and performance considerations largely decoupled. Here, ionomer loading (15, 20, and 25 wt% of total catalyst ink solids) is varied systematically for a short-side-chain ionomer (Aquivion, EW 790) and a long-side-chain ionomer (Nafion, EW 1100) in IrO x -based ACLs. Aquivion exhibited stronger aggregation and a distinct shear-thinning response at high ionomer loading, whereas Nafion showed more gradual rheological evolution. Complete DT requires 20 wt% ionomer for Aquivion and 25 wt% for Nafion, whereas peak performance occurs at 15 and 20 wt%, respectively, delivering cell voltages of approximately 1.82 V (Aquivion) and 1.80 V (Nafion) at 2 A cm −2 . This ionomer-chemistry dependence arises from intrinsic differences in thin-film-forming behavior that shift the balance among proton conduction, electronic percolation, and active-site accessibility across different loading thresholds for each ionomer type. As a result, no universal ionomer loading can satisfy both fabrication and performance requirements. High-ionomer-loaded ACLs deliver superior high-current density performance by improving wettability and suppressing residual losses, a trade-off against low-current density penalties that is most pronounced for Aquivion. These findings demonstrate that fabrication viability and electrochemical performance should be optimized independently and that catalyst-ink formulation requires ionomer-specific consideration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Acheampong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: