Daylighting in large retail buildings is often treated as secondary, despite its impact on energy use and shopper experience. This study evaluates daylighting strategies in a prototype shopping mall in Keffi, Nasarawa State, focusing on visual comfort and balancing useful daylight with excessive solar exposure. Using a quantitative, simulation-based approach, the digital workflow integrated climate-based modeling, a Perez sky model, and a Radiance environment to evaluate a base case against three interventions: roof geometry adjustments, reflective interior finishes, and atrium openings. The base case performed poorly, recording 0% Spatial Daylight Autonomy (sDA) on both ground and first floors. Atrium openings achieved the most significant impact, elevating sDA to 100% on both levels. Roof geometry raised ground and first-floor sDA to 29% and 19%, while reflective finishes yielded 33% and 29%, respectively. However, increased daylight availability caused persistent glare and overexposure. Ground-floor Annual Sunlight Exposure (ASE) exceeded 70% across all scenarios, peaking in the atrium model at 81.387% on the ground floor and 75.912% on the first floor. Consequently, while atria are the most effective distribution strategy, they must be combined with roof geometry, reflective finishes, and targeted shading to provide a balanced framework for tropical Nigerian retail architecture
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Binga et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: