Key result
Low-flow very low-gradient AS linked to ~11% lower 2-year post-TAVI survival versus high-gradient disease.
Why the study?
The impact of low-flow very low-gradient aortic stenosis on survival and functional recovery after TAVI was unclear.
Cohort (n=17,836)
Yes
Absolute Event Rate: 73.2% vs 82%
p-value: p=<.0001
LF-VLG patients show reduced survival and limited functional recovery after TAVI; leaves open net benefit and optimal selection in this observational subgroup.
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: It is unclear how the magnitude of reductions in baseline mean aortic gradient and flow affects clinical outcomes after TAVI. This study aimed to assess the prognostic impact of low-flow very low-gradient (LF-VLG) aortic stenosis on survival and objective functional recovery after TAVI. METHODS: Data from the Spanish TAVI Registry were analyzed. Three groups were included: high-gradient (≥ 40 mmHg), low-flow low-gradient (LF-LG) (20-39 mmHg) and LF-VLG (≤ 20 mmHg). A prospective single-center substudy was conducted to evaluate objective functional recovery after TAVI. RESULTS: A total of 17 836 patients were included. Two-year survival was 82% in the high-gradient group (n = 12 800), 79% in the LF-LG group (n = 4126), and 73.2% in the LF-VLG group (n = 495) (P < .0001). In patients with LF-VLG, coronary artery disease and atrial fibrillation, but not ejection fraction, independently predicted mortality. In a cohort of 465 patients, objective improvement was observed in 88% of patients in the high-gradient group, 70% in the LF-LG group, and 57% in the LF-VLG group (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with LF-VLG aortic stenosis show reduced but acceptable 2-year survival regardless of ejection fraction and limited functional recovery at 6 months after TAVI. Coronary artery disease and atrial fibrillation were independent predictors of mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Torre-Hernández et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Aortic stenosis (n=17,836). Low-flow very low-gradient (LF-VLG) aortic stenosis vs. High-gradient (≥ 40 mmHg) and low-flow low-gradient (20-39 mmHg) aortic stenosis was evaluated on Two-year survival (p=<.0001). Low-flow very low-gradient aortic stenosis was associated with reduced 2-year survival after TAVI compared to high-gradient disease (73.2% vs 82%; P<.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: