In order to evaluate the possible role of the proteolytic enzyme cathepsin B (cath B) in human non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) we examined cath B concentrations (cath B(C)) and activities (cath B(A)) in homogenates of 127 pairs of lung tumour tissues and corresponding non-tumourous lung parenchyma. Total cath B activity (cath B(AT)) and enzymatic activity of the fraction of cath B, which is stable and active at pH 7.5 (cath B(A7.5)) were determined by a fluorogenic assay using synthetic substrate Z-Arg-Arg-AMC. The immunostaining pattern of cath B was determined in 239 lung tumour tissue sections, showing the presence of the enzyme in tumour cells (cath B(T-I)) and in tumour-associated histiocytes (cath B(H-I)). The median levels of cath B(AT), cath B(A7.5) and cath B(C) were 5.6-, 3.2- and 9.1-fold higher (P < 0.001), respectively, in tumour tissue than in non-tumourous lung parenchyma. Out of 131 tissue sections from patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), 59.5% immunostained positively for cath B, while among the 108 adenocarcinoma (AC) patients 48.2% of tumours showed a positive reaction. There was a strong relationship between the levels of cath B(AT), cath B(A7.5), cath B(C) and cath B(T-I) in the primary tumours and the presence of lymph node metastases. Significant correlation with overall survival was observed for cath B(T-I) and cath B(A7.5) (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively) in patients suffering from SCC. In these patients positive cath B in tumour cells (cath B(T-I)) and negative cath B in histiocytes (cath B(H-I)) indicated significantly shorter survival rate compared with patients with negative cath B(T-I) and positive cath B(H-I) (P < 0.0001). In contrast, in AC patients, both, positive cath B(T-I) and positive cath B(H-I), indicated poor survival probability (P < 0.014). From these results we conclude that the proteolytic enzyme cath B is an independent prognostic factor for overall survival of patients suffering from SCC of the lung.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Werle et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: