This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Safe and sustainable global supply of blood and blood components is essential to the health care delivery [1]. Strategies to decrease the risk for transmission of blood-borne pathogens from donors to recipients of blood products involve implementation of risk-based decision-making approaches, such as education and screening of donors for risks of exposure to transfusion-transmissible infections (TTIs) [2]. Testing for TTIs further decreases the risk of transmission. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that screening of all blood donations for HIV, hepatitis B and C, and syphilis should be mandatory, and testing policies for additional TTIs, such as malaria, Chagas disease, human T-cell lymphotropic virus I/II, or cytomegalovirus should be based on local prevalence in the general population and potential risk to recipients [3]. Because of rapidly changing prevalence rates, maintaining blood safety in the context of emerging and re-emerging infections is particularly challenging. In low prevalence settings, most reactive screening tests will be false positives, and confirmation testing will be required [2]. Testing for emerging TTIs should only be considered if (1) there is a proven risk of transmission of infection to recipients; (2) transmission carries a significant disease risk, and (3) appropriate screening assays are available [3].
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hamer et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: