Freeze–thaw deterioration of fiber-reinforced cementitious composites is controlled by matrix cracking, pore-related defects and fiber–matrix interfacial stability. This study compared polypropylene fiber-reinforced cementitious composite (PP-FRCC), polyvinyl alcohol fiber-reinforced cementitious composite (PVA-FRCC) and fiber-free mortar subjected to 0–150 rapid water-freezing/water-thawing cycles. Mass loss, compressive strength, splitting tensile strength and apparent elastic modulus were measured. Splitting-failure photographs, SEM observations, ImageJ-based local image descriptors and a calibrated three-dimensional mesoscale model were used to interpret damage evolution. After 150 cycles, PP-FRCC and PVA-FRCC retained 82.29% and 84.50% of their initial compressive strength, respectively, whereas mortar retained 66.45%. The apparent elastic modulus decreased by 32.9% and 29.2% for PP-FRCC and PVA-FRCC, respectively, indicating higher sensitivity to freeze–thaw damage than compressive strength. SEM-based image analysis showed increasing visible defect area and fiber–matrix interfacial deterioration with cycling; after 150 cycles, the visible defect area ratio reached 6.8% for PP-FRCC and 5.6% for PVA-FRCC, while the interfacial deterioration ratio reached 21.2% and 17.4%, respectively. A calibration-based three-dimensional mesoscale model reproduced the overall compressive degradation trend and visualized the coalescence of equivalent damage fields during subsequent compression. The statistical and image-based results indicate that fiber reinforcement altered the freeze–thaw degradation pathway relative to mortar, while the differences between PP-FRCC and PVA-FRCC were expressed mainly through mass-loss evolution, apparent stiffness retention and local fiber–matrix interfacial deterioration under the present mixture design and testing regime.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: