Key result
Inception V3 deep learning model classifies ECGs with ~97% accuracy in an IoT monitoring prototype.
Why the study?
Remote and portable patient monitoring systems are increasingly important due to population growth, rising health issues, and limited access to medical facilities.
An IoT-based patient monitoring system using an Inception V3 deep learning model can accurately classify ECG signals and reliably measure vital signs.
May support affordable IoT-ECG monitoring development; leaves open prospective clinical validation before adoption.
Currently, healthcare sector is the most dynamic sector in terms of introducing new technologies and services. An innovative advancement in this sector is the remote or portable monitoring of patients, which is proving to be very beneficial in a world with a rapidly expanding population, rising health issues, and limited access to medical facilities. A patient monitoring equipment is often used to quantitatively measure a patient's vital signs, including blood pressure, temperature, ECG, heart rate, and SpO2. This study attempts to enhance the future of healthcare by developing such a patient monitoring system. The ECG dataset was downloaded from CPEIC. The device created for this study can measure four parameters, namely ECG, SpO2, heart rate, and body temperature. The values are displayed on an LCD screen and the device is IoT-based, allowing data transmission to a web application for easy and universal access. To address the issues encountered, the device is designed to be cost-effective, dependable, and portable. The ECG output of this IoT-based model was thoroughly examined and tested using a deep learning model known as Inception V3 to determine the accuracy and dependability of the network. The model obtained phenomenal training loss of 0.1315 and a training accuracy of 96.66%. On the validation set, it achieved a validation loss of 0.1146 and a validation accuracy of 96.90%. Two-dimensional Gaussian elimination was used to remove noise from ECG images.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Raza et al. (2024) studied Vital signs monitoring and ECG classification (n=3). IoT-based patient monitoring system and Inception V3 deep learning model vs. CE registered devices (pulse oximeter, mercury thermometer) was evaluated on Validation accuracy of the Inception V3 deep learning model for ECG classification. The Inception V3 deep learning model achieved a training accuracy of 96.66% and a validation accuracy of 96.90% for ECG classification, while the IoT prototype accurately measured vital signs.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: