Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Three experiments assessed the long-term effectiveness of the keyword mnemonic relative to a nonmnemonic (i.e., semantic-context) learning strategy. Following incidental-learning instructions, cued recall was assessed either immediately or after a 2-day delay. The keyword mnemonic produced superior immediate performance relative to the semantic-context strategy. However, after 2 days, there was a marked reversal in performance, with higher levels of delayed recall associated with semantic-context learning. This pattern of findings was obtained when obscure English words (Experiment 1) and second-language vocabulary (Experiment 2) were the learning stimuli. When practice frequencies were manipulated (Experiment 3), increased opportunities for study were more likely to boost the long-term retention of keyword learners compared with semantic-context learners. The implication is that keyword-based memories are especially fragile over time and will benefit from repeated testing and rehearsal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: