Key result
Type B pre-excitation is linked to a ~52% absolute increase in left axis deviation vs type A.
Why the study?
The relationship between left ventricular hemiblock patterns and ventricular pre-excitation, including axis deviation and conduction defects, requires closer attention to clarify underlying mechanisms.
Observational (n=32)
Absolute Event Rate: 66.7% vs 14.3%
Left axis deviation associates more with type B pre-excitation; leaves open its anatomic basis and clinical utility.
In a study of 32 cases of ventricular pre-excitation, I2 of i8 cases of type B and 2 of I4 cases of type A were found to have left axis deviation.In 6 (i type A and 5 type B) of the ii (4 type A and 7 type B) who had intermittent pre-excitation, a striking shift to the left occurred in the frontal-plane axis with the transition from normal conduction to pre-excitation; that is 5 of 7 type B and only I of 4 type A. Grant's hypothesis that the frequency of left axis deviation may be explained by premature excitation of either division of the main left bundle-branch is therefore not compatible with the currently held belief that type A represents left, and type B right, ventricular pre-excitation.We have been interested in the association of ven- tricular pre-excitation and complete bundle-branch block (Robertson et al., I963) and the clues pro- vided by this association in determining which ven- tricle is excited early.We now consider that pre- excitation combined with ventricular conduction defects oflesser degree deserve closer attention.Their study is best made either on patients with intermit- tent ventricular pre-excitation or on those whose pre- excitation is constant except during attacks of supra- ventricular tachycardia in which the delta wave is no longer evident.Others (Grant, Tomlinson, and Van Buren, I958; Bleifer et al., i959) have com- mented on the striking difference between the scalar and vector electrocardiograms during normal ventricular conduction and pre-excitation in such patients.The dissimilarity is difficult to ascribe to the addition of a delta vector to the normal vector- cardiogram, and Bleifer et al. (i959) concluded that pre-excitation altered the entire course of the spread of excitation in both ventricles.Grant et al. (I958) found that in about half of their cases, when the delta vector is ignored, the change from normal con- duction to pre-excitation was accompanied by a striking change of the frontal-plane axis without prolongation of QRS.They attributed this to a left ventricular conduction defect based upon the bi- divisional structure of the left ventricular conduction pathways; in other words, what would now be called left ventricular hemiblock (Rosenbaum, Elizari, and Lazzari, I967).With this aspect in mind
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lowe et al. (1973) conducted an observational in Ventricular pre-excitation (n=32). Type B ventricular pre-excitation vs. Type A ventricular pre-excitation was evaluated on Left axis deviation. Left axis deviation was observed in 66.7% (12 of 18) of type B pre-excitation cases versus 14.3% (2 of 14) of type A cases, challenging traditional beliefs about ventricular pre-excitation localization.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: