Key result
Autar-scale-guided nursing is linked to ~81% lower DVT risk vs routine care.
Why the study?
The effectiveness of nursing intervention based on the Autar DVT risk assessment scale to reduce DVT incidence in orthopaedic surgery patients was evaluated.
Cohort (n=216)
No
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support Autar scale-guided nursing to lower DVT in orthopedic patients; leaves open confirmation by randomized trials.
Purpose To reduce the incidence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) with nursing intervention based on the Autar DVT risk assessment scale among orthopaedic surgery patients. Methods We recruited 216 orthopaedic surgery patients at our hospital between September 2013 and March 2014. The patients were assigned to intervention and historical control groups based on the time of admission. Using the Autar DVT risk assessment scale, we assessed the DVT risk levels in both groups; the intervention group received the corresponding prophylactic measures while the control group received routine nursing. Results The DVT incidence rate and the D -dimer level on postoperative day 3 in the intervention group were lower (1.82%; 623 ± 225 μg/L, respectively) than that of the control group (9.43%; 825 ± 201 μg/L, respectively); both differences were statistically significant ( p < 0.05). Conclusions The Autar scale is beneficial when used in orthopaedic surgery patients; corresponding nursing intervention based on Autar scale assessment can prevent DVT effectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yin et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in Orthopaedic surgery (n=216). Nursing intervention based on the Autar DVT risk assessment scale vs. Routine nursing (historical control) was evaluated on DVT incidence rate (p=< 0.05). Nursing intervention based on the Autar DVT risk assessment scale reduced the incidence of DVT compared to routine nursing.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: