Key result
Community HF rescreening reveals 11% prevalence, with NT-proBNP 400 pg/mL providing robust diagnostic accuracy.
Why the study?
Progression to heart failure over time in a community population and the role of natriuretic peptide testing in screening were not well characterized.
Cohort (n=1,618)
Yes
Should not yet alter HF screening practices; hypothesis-generating for NT-proBNP thresholds in longitudinal cohorts.
OBJECTIVES: Rescreen a large community cohort to examine the progression to heart failure over time and the role of natriuretic peptide testing in screening. DESIGN: Observational longitudinal cohort study. SETTING: 16 socioeconomically diverse practices in central England. PARTICIPANTS: Participants from the original Echocardiographic Heart of England Screening (ECHOES) study were invited to attend for rescreening. OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of heart failure at rescreening overall and for each original ECHOES subgroup. Test performance of N Terminal pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) levels at different thresholds for screening. RESULTS: 1618 of 3408 participants underwent screening which represented 47% of survivors and 26% of the original ECHOES cohort. A total of 176 (11%, 95% CI 9.4% to 12.5%) participants were classified as having heart failure at rescreening; 103 had heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFREF) and 73 had heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF). Sixty-eight out of 1232 (5.5%, 95% CI 4.3% to 6.9%) participants who were recruited from the general population over the age of 45 and did not have heart failure in the original study, had heart failure on rescreening. An NT-proBNP cut-off of 400 pg/mL had sensitivity for a diagnosis of heart failure of 79.5% (95% CI 72.4% to 85.5%) and specificity of 87% (95% CI 85.1% to 88.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Rescreening identified new cases of HFREF and HFPEF. Progression to heart failure poses a significant threat over time. The natriuretic peptide cut-off level for ruling out heart failure must be low enough to ensure cases are not missed at screening.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taylor et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Heart failure (n=1,618). Community screening and NT-proBNP testing was evaluated on Prevalence of heart failure at rescreening (95% CI 9.4% to 12.5%). Rescreening of a community cohort after 13.4 years identified an 11% prevalence of heart failure, with an NT-proBNP cut-off of 400 pg/mL showing 79.5% sensitivity and 87% specificity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: