Key result
ABPM reclassifies blood pressure control in ~44% of kidney transplant recipients versus office checks.
Why the study?
Hypertension is the most frequent comorbidity in kidney transplant patients, and accurate blood pressure monitoring is crucial to improve patient and graft survival, but the optimal monitoring approach remains uncertain.
Effect estimate: 44% discordance rate
ABPM may improve hypertension classification accuracy in kidney transplant recipients; challenges office BP reliance and leaves open outcome impact.
Kidney transplantation (KT) is an increasingly utilized treatment for end-stage kidney disease. Hypertension either as a cause of kidney disease or as a complication of chronic kidney disease is the most frequently encountered comorbidity of KT patients. Hence, the management of hypertension in KT patients is crucial to prolong patient and graft survival. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) appeared as a promising technique that has superiority over office and home blood pressure (BP) monitoring to correctly diagnose and manage hypertension. A recent meta-analysis by Pisano et al. including 42 studies with 4115 participants provided strong data for the comparison of ABPM with office BP monitoring in KT patients. In addition to the current literature knowledge, the findings of Pisano et al. filled the long-awaited evidence gap to suggest ABPM as a first-line BP monitoring technique for KT patients. Despite its disadvantages, such as patient discomfort, cost–effectiveness and limited availability, ABPM has crucial advantages in the management of hypertension including the detection of abnormal circadian BP patterns, the assessment of effects of physical activity and short-term variability of BP, and the exclusion of masked and white-coat hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Demiray et al. (2021) conducted an editorial in Hypertension in kidney transplant patients (n=4,115). Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) vs. Office blood pressure monitoring was evaluated on Discordance rate for the classification of controlled or uncontrolled hypertension (44% discordance rate). Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is more effective than office measurements for detecting uncontrolled, masked, and white-coat hypertension in kidney transplant patients, showing a 44% discordance rate.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: