Key result
Catheter ablation cuts all-cause mortality ~39% vs. medical therapy in AF with reduced ejection fraction.
Why the study?
The effectiveness of catheter ablation compared with medical therapy in patients with AF and HFrEF/HFmrEF remains incompletely defined.
Does catheter ablation reduce mortality and improve cardiac function compared to conventional medical therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure with reduced or mildly reduced ejection fraction?
Meta-Analysis (n=131,492)
Yes
Does catheter ablation reduce mortality and improve cardiac function compared to conventional medical therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure with reduced or mildly reduced ejection fraction?
Relative Risk: 0.61 (95% CI 0.51–0.71)
p-value: p=<0.00001
Catheter ablation significantly reduces all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and improves left ventricular ejection fraction compared to medical therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation and HFrEF or HFmrEF.
Supports ablation over medical therapy to cut mortality in AF with HFrEF/HFmrEF; confirms benefit in largest meta-analysis to date.
Background: Catheter ablation is an established rhythm-control strategy for atrial fibrillation (AF), but its effectiveness in patients with heart failure with reduced or mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF/HFmrEF) remains incompletely defined. We performed a GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis comparing catheter ablation with conventional medical therapy in this population. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to February 2026. Randomized controlled trials and observational cohort studies enrolling adults with AF and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 50% were included. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and change in LVEF. Secondary outcomes were change in B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and cardiovascular hospitalization. Random-effects models were used, and certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE. Results: Thirteen studies involving 131 492 participants were included. Catheter ablation significantly reduced all-cause mortality (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.51-0.71) and cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.31-0.66), improved LVEF (MD 6.47%, 95% CI 4.47-8.47), and reduced BNP levels (MD -136.85 pg/mL, 95% CI -190.46 to -83.23). No significant reduction was observed in cardiovascular hospitalization (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.53-1.13). Mortality benefits were consistent across subgroup analyses by study design and baseline LVEF. Conclusions: Catheter ablation was associated with lower mortality and improved cardiac function compared with medical therapy in patients with AF and HFrEF/HFmrEF. Further studies specifically evaluating HFmrEF populations are warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Malik et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in Atrial fibrillation with heart failure with reduced or mildly reduced ejection fraction (n=131,492). Catheter ablation vs. Conventional medical therapy was evaluated on All-cause mortality (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.51-0.71, p=<0.00001). Catheter ablation significantly reduced all-cause mortality (RR 0.61) and cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.46) compared with medical therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation and HFrEF/HFmrEF.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: