Key result
Interpreters and tailored materials are recommended to boost guideline adherence in non-English heart failure patients.
Why the study?
Ineffective education for patients with heart failure who do not speak English can lead to poor adherence, reduced self-care, and increased hospital readmissions, necessitating tailored patient-centred care and accessible educational materials.
Underscores need for culturally adapted HF education; leaves open effects on adherence or readmissions in diverse UK populations.
Heart failure affects 1-2% of the UK population with prevalence rates predicted to rise over the next decade. Ineffective education for patients with heart failure can lead to a failure to adhere to guidance, reduced self-care and increased hospital readmissions. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and the World Health Organization (WHO) have issued clear guidelines on patient-centred care in heart failure, particularly in relation to patients' cultural and linguistic needs. Patients with heart failure should have access to an interpreter or advocate if needed. Furthermore, heart failure educational materials should be tailored to suit the individual and be accessible to people who do not speak or read English. This article explores the practice recommendations for these patients with heart failure and provides an overview of current guidelines associated with optimal patient outcomes. It also includes practical advice on translation services, and information and educational materials available for patients with heart failure who do not speak English.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Emma Jane Brennan (2015) conducted a review in Heart failure. Patient-centred care for non-English speakers (interpreters, translated materials) was evaluated. Providing access to interpreters and tailored educational materials is recommended to support heart failure patients who do not speak English and improve adherence to guidance.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: