Key result
Incremental right atrial pacing is linked to a ~50-msec prolongation in interatrial conduction time.
Why the study?
The frequency and characteristics of spontaneous or rate dependent interatrial blocks and interatrial conduction time during AV stimulation were not well characterized in elderly patients.
Observational (n=100)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Interatrial conduction times correlate with left atrial dimension during pacemaker implantation; leaves open whether IACT-guided AV optimization improves hemodynamics.
To evaluate the frequency of spontaneous or rate dependent interatrial blocks, the interatrial conduction time (IACT) was studied on 100 consecutive patients (mean age 78.3 +/- 7.8 years) during a transvenous dual chamber pacemaker implant. The spontaneous interatrial conduction time (SIACT) was measured from the intrinsic deflection (ID) of the unipolar right atrial signal to the ID of the left atrial signal recorded in a bipolar way by an esophageal lead. The paced interatrial conduction time (PIACT) was measured from the stimulus artifact to the left atrial ID, when the atrium was paced at a slightly higher rate than the spontaneous rate and during incremental atrial pacing. From these measurements, the maximum increase of PIACT (MIPIACT) was deduced. In this elderly population, the PIACT was similar (117 +/- 26.9 msec) to the data in the literature. However, there were large interindividual variations that were also found in SIACT. We found a close correlation between SIACT and PIACT (P < 0.0001). PIACT was on average 50 msec longer than SIACT. SIACT increased with age (P < 0.03). The MIPIACT was 15.3 +/- 15.2 msec. In the majority of patients, the MIPIACT was > 10 msec, and even reached 90 msec in one patient. MIPIACT was longer in patients with a PIACT exceeding 110 msec (P < 0.004). Based on IACT alone, the AV interval must be lengthened on average by 50 msec when changing from atrial tracking-ventricular pacing to atrial pacing-ventricular pacing, but large individual differences must be kept in mind. Elderly people should probably have a longer AV delay.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Camous et al. (1993) conducted an observational in Patients undergoing transvenous dual chamber pacemaker implant (n=100). Incremental right atrial stimulation vs. Spontaneous right atrial rate was evaluated on Interatrial conduction time (IACT) (MD 50 msec). Incremental right atrial pacing increased interatrial conduction time by an average of 50 msec compared to spontaneous rhythm during dual chamber pacemaker implantation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: