Key result
Selexipag reduced the risk of the primary composite endpoint of morbidity and mortality compared with placebo in patients with corrected CHD-PAH (HR 0.58; 95% CI 0.25-1.37).
Why the study?
Patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with congenital heart disease after defect correction have a poor prognosis and limited randomized controlled trial evidence supports PAH therapies in this population.
RCT (n=110)
Double-blind
1:1
Yes
Hazard Ratio: 0.58 (95% CI 0.25–1.37)
Absolute Event Rate: 15% vs 26%
May support selexipag consideration in corrected CHD-PAH; extends GRIPHON but leaves efficacy unconfirmed in this subgroup.
AIMS: Patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with congenital heart disease (CHD-PAH) after defect correction have a poor prognosis compared with other CHD-PAH patients. Therefore, it is important that these patients are treated as early and effectively as possible. Evidence supporting the use of PAH therapies in patients with corrected CHD-PAH from randomised controlled trials is limited. The purpose of these analyses was to characterise the corrected CHD-PAH patients from the GRIPHON study and examine the response to selexipag. METHODS AND RESULTS: Out of the 110 patients diagnosed with corrected CHD-PAH, 55 had atrial septal defects, 38 had ventricular septal defects, 14 had persistent ducti arteriosus, and 3 had defects not further specified. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the primary composite endpoint were calculated using Cox proportional hazard models. Compared with the non-CHD patients from GRIPHON, patients with corrected CHD-PAH were slightly younger, with a greater proportion being treatment-naive and in World Health Organization functional class I/II. The rate of the primary composite endpoint of morbidity/mortality was lower in patients with corrected CHD-PAH who were treated with selexipag compared with those treated with placebo (HR 0.58; 95% CI 0.25, 1.37). The most common adverse events were those known to be related to selexipag. CONCLUSIONS: These post-hoc analyses of GRIPHON provide valuable information about a large population of patients with corrected CHD-PAH, and suggest that selexipag may delay disease progression and was well-tolerated in patients with corrected CHD-PAH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beghetti et al. (2019) conducted an RCT in Pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with congenital heart disease after defect correction (corrected CHD-PAH) (n=110). Selexipag vs. Placebo was evaluated on Time from randomisation to first morbidity/mortality event up to the end of double-blind treatment (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.25, 1.37). Selexipag reduced the risk of the primary composite endpoint of morbidity and mortality compared with placebo in patients with corrected CHD-PAH (HR 0.58; 95% CI 0.25-1.37).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: