Key result
Baseline AF in first-time ICD recipients is linked to ~84% more anti-tachycardia pacing.
Why the study?
Clinical factors associated with baseline history of atrial fibrillation in first-time ICD recipients and their impact on subsequent clinical outcomes were not well defined.
Cohort (n=566)
No
Hazard Ratio: 1.84 (95% CI 1.19–2.85)
Absolute Event Rate: 25% vs 17%
p-value: p=0.006
Baseline AF flags higher shock risk in new ICD recipients; leaves open whether rhythm control reduces therapies.
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is frequently present in patients with heart failure (HF) and an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). This study aims to identify clinical factors associated with a baseline history of AF in ICD recipients, and compares subsequent clinical outcomes in those with and without a baseline history of AF. METHODS: We studied 566 consecutive first-time ICD recipients at an academic center between 2011 and 2018. Logistic regression multivariable analyses were used to identify clinical factors associated with a baseline history of AF at the time of ICD implant. Cox-proportional hazard regression models were constructed for multivariate analysis to examine associations between a baseline history of AF with subsequent clinical outcomes, including ICD therapies, HF readmission, and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Of all patients, 201 (36%) had a baseline history of AF at the time of ICD implant. In multivariate analyses, clinical factors associated with a baseline history of AF included hypertension, valvular heart disease, body weight, PR interval, and serum creatinine level. After multivariate adjustment for potential confounders, a baseline history of AF was associated with an increased risk of anti-tachycardia pacing (HR = 1.84, 95% CI = 1.19-2.85, P = .006), appropriate ICD shocks (HR = 1.80, 95% CI = 1.05-3.09, P = .032), and inappropriate ICD shocks (HR = 3.72, 95% CI = 1.7-7.77, P = .0001), but not other adverse outcomes. CONCLUSION: Among first-time ICD recipients, specific clinical characteristics were associated with a baseline history of AF at the time of ICD implant. After adjustment for potential confounders, a baseline history of AF was associated with a higher risk of all ICD therapies in follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giancaterino et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in First-time ICD recipients (n=566). Baseline history of atrial fibrillation vs. No baseline history of atrial fibrillation was evaluated on Anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) therapy (HR 1.84, 95% CI 1.19-2.85, p=0.006). A baseline history of atrial fibrillation in first-time ICD recipients was associated with an increased risk of anti-tachycardia pacing (HR 1.84), appropriate shocks (HR 1.80), and inappropriate shocks (HR 3.72).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: