Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This work tests whether a source–observer propagation relation calibrated independently from Pantheon+ Type Ia supernova data can forward-generate the GW150914 gravitational-wave (GW) chirp when applied unchanged in the gravitational-wave domain. By using leading-order chirp dynamics recovered as the GR 0PN limit of the UMH formulation, together with this fixed propagation relation, a strictly constrained forward waveform generator produces a waveform consistent with the observed inspiral–merger–ringdown morphology of GW150914, including chirp frequency evolution, merger timing, and a ringdown phase modeled as intrinsic relaxation dynamics. The generated signal is projected onto the LIGO detectors using standard antenna response functions and geometric time delays. A separate comparison with the publicly available strain data uses a single global time/polarity registration anchor and introduces no per-detector fitting, phase adjustment, frequency remapping, empirical amplitude fitting, waveform reparameterization, or higher-order tuning. This is not a template-fitting analysis, nor is it a competing replacement for General Relativity. In the present framing, the GR-order chirp law is recovered as the effective large-scale limit, while the specific objective of this paper is narrower: to test whether a propagation law fixed independently in cosmology remains self-consistent when applied to gravitational-wave observations. The propagation parameter governing the source–observer mapping is determined entirely from the Pantheon+ supernova dataset and is not recalibrated for the gravitational-wave signal, allowing GW150914 to serve as an independent cross-domain test. The forward model reproduces key features of the observed GW150914 morphology without event-specific waveform tuning, yielding network signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) ≳ 22 at the strongest detector-network consistency point of the coarse event-configuration sweep, under standard whitening and fixed-registration diagnostics. These results demonstrate that a gravitational-wave chirp can be forward-generated from an independently calibrated propagation law while preserving consistency across frequency evolution, phase accumulation, amplitude normalization, and ringdown relaxation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrew S. Dodge (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: