Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Long-term and short-term measurements of indoor 222Rn from 480 houses located in eleven states were used to study the relationship between the annual living area average (ALAA) and 1) a single 2 d measurement and 2) the mean of multiple 2 d measurements (taken in different seasons). Of particular interest is the issue of using a short-term measurement(s) to predict the ALAA in a given house. The results indicate that with 95% confidence (approximately): 1) a single 2 d measurement gives an interval estimate of the true ALAA that is within a factor of 2.5 of the predicted ALAA; and 2) a mean of two 2 d measurements (taken in different seasons) gives an interval estimate that is within a factor of 2.2 of the predicted ALAA. If a more precise estimate of the ALAA is needed, then an alternative procedure to using 2 d measurements should be employed (e.g., measure the annual concentration directly).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
White et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: