Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Distributed Earth Observation (EO) workflows require cluster configurations that balance competing objectives (execution time, computational cost, energy consumption, and resource-use efficiency), yet practitioners typically provision resources using fixed heuristics that ignore most of these dimensions. This paper presents an outcome-as-a-service framework for Dask-based EO processing that jointly optimises all four objectives. A systematic measurement campaign on bare-metal infrastructure characterises execution time, processor and DRAM energy (via Intel RAPL), cost, and frugality across three spectral-index operators, five input data sizes, fifteen cluster shapes, and three CPU frequency governors. Configuration selection is formulated as a weighted multi-objective optimisation, in which users encode their priorities using a single weight vector across the four objectives. The resulting framework is delivered as a lightweight outcome-as-a-service that, given a workload description and user-defined weights, returns ranked configurations with predicted objective values in sub-second latency. An empirical evaluation against three deployable baselines and the best attainable configuration demonstrates that the service matches a biggest-tier oracle on execution time, cost, and energy while running up to roughly twice as fast as naive small-cluster and default provisioning, and improves frugality by up to 18% over every deployable baseline. All results are scoped to Dask-based EO workflows on homogeneous Intel Broadwell bare-metal hardware; monetary cost is computed from AWS c5 on-demand pricing as a reproducible proxy, and reported energy reflects CPU and DRAM domains measured via Intel RAPL.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lalayan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: