Executive compensation design is central to corporate governance. Pay contracts may shape managers’ incentives to undertake investments with delayed returns. This paper analyzes how the equity-based and long-term component of CEO compensation relates to strategic investment, productivity, and operating performance among U.S. public firms covered by Compustat and ExecuComp over 1992–2017. We estimate a recursive generalized structural equation model linking the share of equity-based and long-term compensation (EB-LT) to R&D expenditure, advertising expenditure, Levinsohn–Petrin total factor productivity, and EBITDA, and examine CEO firm-specific tenure as a moderator. A 10-percentage-point higher EB-LT share is associated with 11.4% higher R&D spending and 8.9% higher advertising spending. R&D and advertising are, in turn, strongly related to productivity, and productivity is positively related to EBITDA. The findings identify a structured compensation–investment–productivity–performance nexus in which EB-LT compensation is most consistently connected to strategic investment channels. They also suggest that equity-based incentive design should be evaluated jointly with firms’ investment strategies, productivity outcomes, and CEO tenure profiles, rather than viewed in isolation as a mechanism for improving productivity or profits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Araya-Castillo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: