Key result
Regadenoson yields ~4% higher 15-minute LVEF compared to adenosine.
Why the study?
The effects of adenosine and regadenoson on CMR-derived ventricular volumes and function are unknown despite their use in vasodilator stress CMR for coronary artery disease evaluation.
Absolute Event Rate: 67.2% vs 63%
p-value: p=0.0015
Vasodilator effects on CMR volumes and LVEF warrant pre-stress functional imaging in protocols; leaves open optimal sequencing in patients with CAD.
BACKGROUND: Adenosine or regadenoson vasodilator stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is an effective non-invasive strategy for evaluating symptomatic coronary artery disease. Vasodilator injection typically precedes ventricular functional sequences to efficiently reduce overall scanning times, though the effects of vasodilators on CMR-derived ventricular volumes and function are unknown. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 25 healthy subjects to undergo consecutive adenosine and regadenoson administration. Short axis CINE datasets were obtained on a 1.5 T scanner following adenosine (140mcg/kg/min IV for 6 min) and regadenoson (0.4 mg IV over 10 s) at baseline, immediately following administration, at 5 min intervals up to 15 min. Hemodynamic response, bi-ventricular volumes and ejection fractions were determined at each time point. RESULTS: Peak heart rate was observed early following administration of both adenosine and regadenoson. Heart rate returned to baseline by 10 min post-adenosine while remaining elevated at 15 min post-regadenoson (p = 0.0015). Left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) increased immediately following both vasodilators (p < 0.0001 for both) and returned to baseline following adenosine by 10 min (p = 0.8397). Conversely, LVEF following regadenoson remained increased at 10 min (p = 0.003) and 15 min (p = 0.0015) with a mean LVEF increase at 15 min of 4.2 ± 1.3%. Regadenoson resulted in a similar magnitude reduction in both LV end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVi) and LV end-systolic volume index (LVESVi) at 15 min whereas LVESVi resolved at 15 min following adenosine and LVEDVi remained below baseline values (p = 0.52). CONCLUSIONS: Regadenoson and adenosine have significant and prolonged impact on ventricular volumes and LVEF. In patients undergoing vasodilator stress CMR where ventricular volumes and LVEF are critical components to patient care, ventricular functional sequences should be performed prior to vasodilator use or consider the use of aminophylline in the setting of regadenoson. Additionally, heart rate resolution itself is not an effective surrogate for return of ventricular volumes and LVEF to baseline.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thomas et al. (2016) studied Healthy subjects (n=25). Regadenoson vs. Adenosine (140mcg/kg/min IV for 6 min) was evaluated on Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at 15 minutes (p=0.0015). Regadenoson administration resulted in a persistently elevated left ventricular ejection fraction at 15 minutes compared to adenosine (67.2% vs 63.0%, p=0.0015).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: