Key result
Higher home pulse pressure links to greater target organ damage, tracking with elevated BNP below age 75.
Why the study?
The relationship of clinic and self-measured pulse pressure with target organ damage in treated hypertensive patients across different age groups was unclear.
Cross-Sectional (n=597)
May support self-monitored pulse pressure as a marker of subclinical damage; leaves open its added value for risk stratification in hypertension.
The authors examined the relationship of clinic and self-measured pulse pressure with target organ damage in 597 treated hypertensive patients without clinical evidence of renal dysfunction or a history of heart failure. The cross-sectional relationships of plasma brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and urinary albumin/creatinine ratio with clinic and self-monitored pulse pressures were estimated in age tertile groups: younger than 67 years (n=193), 67 to 75 years (n=216), and older than 75 years (n=188), controlling for various confounding factors. In multivariable analyses, both clinic and self-monitored higher pulse pressures were associated with increased urinary albumin/creatinine ratio in all 3 age groups. Self-monitored higher pulse pressure, but not clinic pulse pressure, was consistently associated with increased BNP in the younger and middle-aged patients. In the very old (older than 75 years), however, there were no consistent associations between pulse pressure measures and BNP. More studies are needed in the evaluation of cardiac risk with hemodynamic measures in the very old.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matsui et al. (2007) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypertension (n=597). Self-monitored pulse pressure vs. Clinic pulse pressure was evaluated on Target organ damage (plasma brain natriuretic peptide and urinary albumin/creatinine ratio). Higher self-monitored pulse pressure was associated with increased urinary albumin/creatinine ratio across all ages, and increased BNP in patients under 75 years, but not in those over 75.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: