Key result
Adding a dental score to biomarkers improves CHD discrimination over Framingham score to ~0.82 C-statistic.
Why the study?
Oral infections may produce cytokines contributing to CHD pathogenesis, and combining inflammatory mediators from oral pathologies might better explain CHD.
Case-Control (n=506)
No
Oral infection burden associated with prevalent CHD; leaves open causal role and need for prospective trials.
BACKGROUND: Oral infections have been postulated to produce cytokines that may contribute to the pathogenesis of coronary heart disease (CHD). We hypothesized that by estimating the combined production of inflammatory mediators attributable to several oral pathologies, we might be able to explain CHD with better precision. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 256 consecutive Finnish cardiac patients from Kuopio University Hospital with angiographically confirmed CHD and 250 age-, gender-, and residence-matched noncardiac patients (controls) were recruited. All dental factors expected to generate inflammatory mediators, including pericoronitis, dental caries, dentate status, root remnants, and gingivitis, were examined, and an asymptotic dental score (ADS) was developed by logistic regression analyses with an appropriate weighting scheme according to the likelihood ratio. We validated the explanatory ability of ADS by comparing it to that of the Total Dental Index and examining whether the ADS was associated with known predictors of CHD. A model that included ADS, C-reactive protein, HDL, and fibrinogen offered an explanatory ability that equaled or exceeded that of the Framingham heart score (C statistic=0.82 versus 0.80). When ADS was removed from this model, the C-statistic decreased to 0.77, which indicates that the ADS was a significant contributor to the explanatory ability of a logistic model. CONCLUSIONS: ADS may be useful as a prescreening tool to promote proactive cardiac evaluation among individuals without overt symptoms of CHD. However, additional prospective study is needed to validate the use of an oral health score as a predictor of incident CHD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Janket et al. (2004) conducted a case-control in Coronary Heart Disease (n=506). Asymptotic dental score (ADS) vs. Model without ADS / Framingham heart score was evaluated on Explanatory ability for coronary heart disease. A model incorporating an asymptotic dental score alongside CRP, HDL, and fibrinogen explained CHD better than the Framingham heart score (C-statistic 0.82 vs 0.80).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: