Key result
QRISK3 shows comparable discrimination to SCORE for detecting carotid plaques in inflammatory bowel disease.
Why the study?
Information on the predictive value of cardiovascular risk calculators for assessing risk in patients with inflammatory bowel disease is scarce.
Cross-Sectional (n=364)
Yes
Absolute Event Rate: 0.812% vs 0.79%
p-value: p=0.051
Trend toward better QRISK3 discrimination in IBD does not support changing calculators; leaves open need for outcome-validated prospective studies.
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been described as an independent risk factor for the development of cardiovascular (CV) disease. Since the QRESEARCH risk estimator version 3 (QRISK3) calculator was recently proposed to assess CV in the general population, our objective was to compare the predictive ability of QRISK3 with that of a well-established European CV risk calculator, the Systematic Coronary Risk Assessment (SCORE), to identify the presence of subclinical carotid atherosclerosis in patients with IBD. In all, 186 patients with IBD and 178 controls were recruited. The presence of subclinical atherosclerosis was evaluated by carotid ultrasound to identify carotid plaque and the thickness of the carotid intima-media (cIMT). QRISK3 and SCORE were calculated. The relationship of QRISK3 and SCORE with each other and with the presence of subclinical carotid atherosclerosis (both carotid plaque and cIMT) was studied in patients and controls. SCORE (0.2 (interquartile range 0.1–0.9) vs. 0.4 (0.1–1.4), p = 0.55) and QRISK3 1.7 ((0.6–4.6) vs. 3.0 (1.0–7.8), p = 0.16) absolute values did not differ between patients and controls. QRISK3 and SCORE correlated equally with cIMT within both populations. However, SCORE correlation with cIMT was found to be significantly lower in patients with IBD when compared to controls (Spearman’s Rho 0.715 vs. 0.587, p = 0.034). Discrimination analysis of both calculators with carotid plaque was similar within both populations. Nevertheless, in patients with IBD, QRISK3 showed a trend toward a higher discrimination (QRISK3 area under the curve 0.812 (95%CI 0.748–0.875) vs. SCORE 0.790 (95%CI 0.723–0.856), p = 0.051). In conclusion, QRISK3 discrimination for subclinical atherosclerosis is optimal and equivalent to that of SCORE in IBD patients. However, our findings highlight the role of QRISK3 as an appropriate tool for the assessment of CV risk in patients with IBD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Palau et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (n=364). QRISK3 calculator vs. SCORE calculator was evaluated on Carotid plaque discrimination (Area Under the Curve) (p=0.051). In patients with inflammatory bowel disease, the QRISK3 calculator showed a trend toward higher discrimination for the presence of subclinical carotid plaques compared to the SCORE calculator (AUC 0.812 vs 0.790; p=0.051).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: