Key result
Adjusted QTc risk score predicts QTc prolongation with ~83% negative predictive value.
Why the study?
Drug-drug interaction warnings for QTc-prolonging medications cause alert fatigue due to patient non-specificity or low risk, motivating development of a patient-specific QTc-prolongation risk score.
Observational (n=100)
Custom QTc risk-score alerts may curb override fatigue; leaves open whether they outperform standard DDI warnings in outcomes.
Introduction: Drug-drug interaction (DDI) warnings are employed in many institutions when more than one QTc-prolonging medication is prescribed; however, this leads to alert fatigue where alerts are frequently overridden by clinicians due to patient non-specificity or low risk. This study aimed at reducing alert fatigue through developing a custom alert triggered by a patient-specific QTc-prolongation risk score, and validating it against database-driven DDI warnings for QTc prolongation. Methods and Results: Between November 23, 2019 and January 31, 2020, inpatients with a baseline and a follow-up 12-lead ECG reading within 14 days were identified. Each time a QTc-prolonging medication order was signed or verified, the QTc-prolongation risk score was calculated in the electronic health record (EHR), triggering a custom alert in the background. Follow-up 12-lead ECG readings were used to calculate sensitivity and specificity for both the custom alert and the DDI warning. A total of 100 patients had a risk score calculation and were included in our analysis, representing 521 custom alerts and 449 DDI warnings. The preliminary QTc-prolongation risk score did not achieve a reduction in false positive alerts with a cutoff of 10 points. A multiple logistic regression was performed to re-arrange the components and optimize the risk score. Conclusion: Our adjusted QTc-prolongation risk score, with a cutoff of 5 points, achieved a specificity of 66% and a negative predictive value of 83%. These results will allow us to integrate the risk score into the EHR as a guidance tool to predict QTc-prolongation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aboujaoude et al. (2021) conducted an observational in QTc prolongation (n=100). Adjusted QTc-prolongation risk score vs. Database-driven DDI warnings was evaluated on Sensitivity and specificity for QTc-prolongation. An adjusted QTc-prolongation risk score with a cutoff of 5 points achieved a specificity of 66% and a negative predictive value of 83% for predicting QTc-prolongation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: