Key result
Lisinopril lowers dorsal aortic pressure but fails to alter venous vascular compliance or capacity.
Why the study?
Mean circulatory filling pressure, vascular compliance, and unstressed blood volume are important cardiovascular indexes in mammals but have not been measured in fish.
ACE inhibition lowers pressure without venous effects in trout; leaves open translation to mammalian hemodynamics.
Mean circulatory filling pressure (MCFP), whole body vascular compliance (C), and unstressed blood volume (USV) are important indexes of cardiovascular function in mammals, but they have not been measured in fish. In the present experiments, dorsal aortic (PDA) and sinus venosus (PSV) pressures were measured in unanesthetized trout before and during electrical cardiac fibrillation, while blood volume (BV) was manipulated between 50 and 150% of normal. Measurements were repeated after angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition with lisinopril. Cardiac fibrillation (zero-flow condition) rapidly (approximately 5 s) dropped PDA and increased PSV (equals MCFP). MCFP in normovolemic trout (4.8 +/- 0.3 mmHg) varied directly with BV. C determined from in vivo capacitance curves was similar to that obtained gravimetrically, in vitro (3.4 and 3.5 ml.mmHg-1.kg body wt-1, respectively). USV was 13.3 ml/kg body wt (approximately 45% of BV). ACE inhibition reduced PDA in unfibrillated trout at all BV and reduced PDA in fibrillated fish at BV > or = 80%. ACE inhibition did not affect PSV, MCFP, C, or USV. The systemic arteriovenous pressure gradient at zero flow (delta PF0) was greatest at 100% BV (8.2 +/- 0.5 mmHg) and was reduced by ACE inhibition at 80-120% BV. These results show that key indexes of venous function are readily measured in fish and that the trout venous system is not an effector of angiotensin-mediated regulation of arterial blood pressure. Thus angiotensin acts solely on arterial resistance vessels. Furthermore, the drop in delta PF0 during ACE inhibition is due to a decrease in arteriolar resistance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kenneth Ray Olson (1995) studied this question. ACE inhibition with lisinopril vs. Before ACE inhibition was evaluated on Vascular compliance, unstressed blood volume, and mean circulatory filling pressure. ACE inhibition with lisinopril reduced dorsal aortic pressure but did not affect mean circulatory filling pressure, whole body vascular compliance, or unstressed blood volume in trout.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: