Key result
Clinical model predicts post-ambulatory surgery psychological vulnerability with a c-index of ~0.76.
Why the study?
Ambulatory surgery patients are at risk of adverse psychological outcomes, and a clinical prediction model to identify vulnerable patients was needed.
Cohort (n=383)
Double-blind
No
Effect estimate: ORC 0.76
May aid preoperative risk stratification in ambulatory surgery; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
BACKGROUND: Ambulatory surgery patients are at risk of adverse psychological outcomes such as anxiety, aggression, fatigue, and depression. We developed and validated a clinical prediction model to identify patients who were vulnerable to these psychological outcome parameters. METHODS: We prospectively assessed 383 mixed ambulatory surgery patients for psychological vulnerability, defined as the presence of anxiety (state/trait), aggression (state/trait), fatigue, and depression seven days after surgery. Three psychological vulnerability categories were considered-i.e., none, one, or multiple poor scores, defined as a score exceeding one standard deviation above the mean for each single outcome according to normative data. The following determinants were assessed preoperatively: sociodemographic (age, sex, level of education, employment status, marital status, having children, religion, nationality), medical (heart rate and body mass index), and psychological variables (self-esteem and self-efficacy), in addition to anxiety, aggression, fatigue, and depression. A prediction model was constructed using ordinal polytomous logistic regression analysis, and bootstrapping was applied for internal validation. The ordinal c-index (ORC) quantified the discriminative ability of the model, in addition to measures for overall model performance (Nagelkerke's R (2) ). RESULTS: In this population, 137 (36%) patients were identified as being psychologically vulnerable after surgery for at least one of the psychological outcomes. The most parsimonious and optimal prediction model combined sociodemographic variables (level of education, having children, and nationality) with psychological variables (trait anxiety, state/trait aggression, fatigue, and depression). Model performance was promising: R (2) = 30% and ORC = 0.76 after correction for optimism. CONCLUSION: This study identified a substantial group of vulnerable patients in ambulatory surgery. The proposed clinical prediction model could allow healthcare professionals the opportunity to identify vulnerable patients in ambulatory surgery, although additional modification and validation are needed. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01441843).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stolker et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Ambulatory surgery patients (n=383). Sociodemographic and psychological determinants was evaluated on Psychological vulnerability (presence of anxiety, aggression, fatigue, and depression 7 days after surgery) (ORC 0.76). A clinical prediction model combining sociodemographic and psychological variables demonstrated promising performance in identifying psychological vulnerability after ambulatory surgery, achieving an ordinal c-index of 0.76.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: